Junk DNA after all?

Another entry in the great debate. A plant that has a very small genome with little “junk”. Comments? Does this change the conclusions many people had from the ENCODE project?

The bladderwort plant:bladderwort-plant


One response to “Junk DNA after all?”

  1. David Snoke

    Is this logically the same as saying that you have found a species with no tail, so therefore tails are useless junk? Or perhaps, I have found a simple worm species with no head, so therefore heads are useless?

Leave a Reply